Prince Andrew's BBC interview

His involvement with Jeffery Epstein

My Analysis 11/19/2019 

I watched the interview Prince Andrew had with the BBC regarding his involvement with Jeffery Epstein. His qualifying statements and his lack of recollection of people and events throughout the interview was stunning. When asked why did you to fly to New York when Epstein was released from prison to talk to him? He stated because " he is to honorable to just break off their friendship over the phone." He stayed with Epstein for four days. It took you four days to say goodbye to Epstein and break off your friendship with him. When asked about him dancing with a young girl at a night club in London called the Tramp and going back to Epstein's girlfriends friends house and having sex, he stated that never happened. He was having a pizza night with his daughter that very night. He remembered that night having a pizza night with his daughter yet throughout his interview he could not recall or remember anything else.  The girl stated he was sweating very much while dancing with her at the nightclub that night, he stated that he cannot sweat, because he was shot at during his time fighting in the Falkland Islands.  He acquired a medical condition that makes it impossible for him to sweat. That is nonsense. He also stated he does not drink and does not know where the bar is located in the club Tramp. A club you have been in before.   

The interview was an hour long, his body language was off, his fake facial expressions of surprise and shock at some of the questions the interviewer was asking were very contrived, single shoulder shrugs shows he was not Limbic committed to his statements. His equivocal statements such as I do not recall, I do not remember, I think, I believe and using the word "really" when the interviewer stated you have been called the party Prince. He answered back "I never have really partied," this is telling me you have partied.  In this context the word "really" indicates deception.  When the interviewer stated that a Mr. Brockman saw you getting a foot massage from a young Russian woman in Epstein's house he stated no, she asked so is Mr. Brockman's statement false? He did not answer yes the statement is false, he answered "I don't know Mr. Brockman so I don't know what he is talking about." That is not an answer to her question. The interviewer also asked "is the girl who is accusing you of having sex with her lying?" He could not and did not answer  her question. He never said she is lying. He also never stated in his interview "I didn't have sex with her or anyone else. Last but not least he stated time and time again he never recalls meeting her, yet he states "we never had any sexual contact"  this could be a generic "we" when talking about two people. The pronoun "we" indicates a partnership of some sort. I do not know how much of a partnership exists but there is a partnership.  If I do not know you and I have never met you, there is no partnership. I would not use the pronoun "we."

A better statement should have been, I don't know her, I never met her, I didn't have any sexual contact with her, she is lying. He never stated that. He stated he does not know why she is saying that or what her motives are. That was not the question that was asked. He was asked is she lying? His lack of emotions throughout the interview was very suspect. I would have been angry as hell. The innocent go forward not backward.  I saw no anger, no remorse for the victims, no true felt emotions of any kind. I could go on and on here the bottom line is Prince Andrew is being deceptive. He knows more than he is stating in this interview and was involved with Jeffery Epstein much more than he wants to admit. No rational person would believe that you knew nothing or you had no "idea" about Jeffery Epstein's life style and his questionable behavior with young girls for the length of time you have known him.        

USA Today
20 minutes ago
11/20/2019

Prince Andrew will step away from his public duties as a royal following the fallout from his past friendship with late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 

"It has become clear to me over the last few days that the circumstances relating to my former association with Jeffrey Epstein has become a major disruption to my family's work and the valuable work going on in the many organizations and charities that I am proud to support," the queen's second son said in a Wednesday statement released by Buckingham Palace. "Therefore, I have asked Her Majesty if I may step back from public duties for the foreseeable future, and she has given her permission."